Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2023)
Metrics details
Tree canopies are one of the most recognizable features of forests, providing shelter from external influences to a myriad of species that live within and below the tree foliage. Canopy disturbances are now increasing across European forests, and climate-change-induced drought is a key driver, together with pests and pathogens, storms and fire. These disturbances are opening the canopy and exposing below-canopy biodiversity and functioning to novel light regimes—spatial and temporal characteristics of light distribution at forest floors not found previously. The majority of forest biodiversity occurs in the shade within and below tree canopies, and numerous ecosystem processes are regulated at the forest floor. Altered light regimes, in interaction with other global change drivers, can thus strongly impact forest biodiversity and functioning. As recent European droughts are unprecedented in the past two millennia, and this has initiated probably the largest pulse of forest disturbances in almost two centuries, we urgently need to quantify, understand and predict the impacts of novel light regimes on below-canopy forest biodiversity and functions. This will be a crucial element in delivering much-needed information for policymakers and managers to adapt European forests to future no-analogue conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Lowman, M. D. & Wittman, P. K. Forest canopies: methods, hypotheses, and future directions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 55–81 (1996).
Article Google Scholar
Gilliam, F. (ed.) The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).
De Frenne, P. et al. Global buffering of temperatures under forest canopies. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 744–749 (2019).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Senior, R. A., Hill, J. K., Benedick, S. & Edwards, D. P. Tropical forests are thermally buffered despite intensive selective logging. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1267–1278 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Frey, S. J. K. et al. Spatial models reveal the microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501392 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Verheyen, K. et al. Driving factors behind the eutrophication signal in understorey plant communities of deciduous temperate forests. J. Ecol. 100, 352–365 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Boyle, M. J. W. et al. Localised climate change defines ant communities in human-modified tropical landscapes. Funct. Ecol. 35, 1094–1108 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
De Frenne, P. et al. Forest microclimates and climate change: importance, drivers and future research agenda. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2279–2297 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
De Frenne, P. et al. Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18561–18565 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zellweger, F. et al. Forest microclimate dynamics drive plant responses to warming. Science 368, 772–775 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McDowell, N. G. et al. Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world. Science 368, eaaz9463 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Persistent impacts of the 2018 drought on forest disturbance regimes in Europe. Biogeosciences 18, 5223–5230 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Ceccherini, G. et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature 583, 72–77 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
State of Europe’s Forests 2020, https://foresteurope.org/state-europes-forests-2020/ (Forest Europe, 2020).
Pretzsch, H., Biber, P., Schütze, G., Uhl, E. & Rötzer, T. Forest stand growth dynamics in central Europe have accelerated since 1870. Nat. Commun. 5, 4967 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Senf, C. & Seidl, R. Mapping the forest disturbance regimes of Europe. Nat. Sustain. 4, 63–70 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Hartmann, H. et al. Climate change risks to global forest health: emergence of unexpected events of elevated tree mortality worldwide. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 73, 673–702 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Patacca, M. et al. Significant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 1359–1376 (2023).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Samaniego, L. et al. Anthropogenic warming exacerbates European soil moisture droughts. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 421–426 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Büntgen, U. et al. Recent European drought extremes beyond Common Era background variability. Nat. Geosci. 14, 190–196 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Vicente-Serrano, S. M. et al. A new global 0.5 gridded dataset (1901–2006) of a multiscalar drought index: comparison with current drought index datasets based on the Palmer Drought Severity Index. J. Hydrometeorol. 11, 1033–1043 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Brodribb, T. J., Powers, J., Cochard, H. & Choat, B. Hanging by a thread? Forests and drought. Science 368, 261–266 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brodribb, T. J. & Cochard, H. Hydraulic failure defines the recovery and point of death in water-stressed conifers. Plant Physiol. 149, 575–584 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nagel, T. A. et al. The natural disturbance regime in forests of the Dinaric Mountains: a synthesis of evidence. For. Ecol. Manage. 388, 29–42 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Sousa-Silva, R. et al. Tree diversity mitigates defoliation after a drought-induced tipping point. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4304–4315 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Pollastrini, M., Puletti, N., Selvi, F., Iacopetti, G. & Busotti, F. Widespread crown defoliation after a drought and heat wave in the forests of Tuscany (central Italy) and their recovery—a case study from summer 2017. Front. For. Glob. Change 2, 74 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Anderegg, W. R. et al. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Senf, C. et al. Canopy mortality has doubled in Europe’s temperate forests over the last three decades. Nat. Commun. 9, 4978 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 395–402 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Roberts, M. R. Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Can. J. Bot. 82, 1273–1283 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
Sayer, E. J., Heard, M. S., Grant, H. K., Marthews, T. R. & Tanner, E. V. J. Soil carbon release enhanced by increased tropical forest litterfall. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 304–307 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. C. & Wardle, D. A. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 421–428 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Landuyt, D. et al. The functional role of temperate forest understorey vegetation in a changing world. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3625–3641 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Lendzion, J. & Leuschner, C. Temperate forest herbs are adapted to high air humidity—evidence from climate chamber and humidity manipulation experiments in the field. Can. J. For. Res. 39, 2332–2342 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
Hardwick, S. R. et al. The relationship between leaf area index and microclimate in tropical forest and oil palm plantation: forest disturbance drives changes in microclimate. Agric. For. Meteorol. 201, 187–195 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zellweger, F. et al. Seasonal drivers of understorey temperature buffering in temperate deciduous forests across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 1774–1786 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
De Frenne, P. et al. Light accelerates plant responses to warming. Nat. Plants 1, 15110 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Dietz, L. et al. Windstorm‐induced canopy openings accelerate temperate forest adaptation to global warming. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 2067–2077 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Hylander, K., Greiser, C., Christiansen, D. M. & Koelemeijer, I. A. Climate adaptation of biodiversity conservation in managed forest landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13847 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Williams, J. W. & Jackson, S. T. Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 475–482 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
Hanewinkel, M., Cullmann, D. A., Schelhaas, M. J., Nabuurs, G. J. & Zimmermann, N. E. Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 203–207 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Batllori, E. et al. Forest and woodland replacement patterns following drought-related mortality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29720–29729 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fung Au, T. et al. Younger trees in the upper canopy are more sensitive but also more resilient to drought. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1168–1174 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
Bennett, A. C., McDowell, N. G., Allen, C. D. & Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide. Nat. Plants 1, 15139 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Gentilesca, T., Camarero, J. J., Colangelo, M., Nolè, A. & Ripullone, F. Drought-induced oak decline in the western Mediterranean region: an overview on current evidences, mechanisms and management options to improve forest resilience. iForest 10, 796–806 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Schuldt, B. et al. A first assessment of the impact of the extreme 2018 summer drought on central European forests. Basic Appl. Ecol. 45, 86–103 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Bachofen, C. et al. Stand structure of central European forests matters more than climate for transpiration sensitivity to VPD. J. Appl. Ecol. 60, 886–897 (2023).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Segar, J. et al. Divergent roles of herbivory in eutrophying forests. Nat. Commun. 13, 7837 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Blondeel, H. et al. The need for an understory decision support system for temperate deciduous forest management. For. Ecol. Manage. 480, 118634 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Findlater, K., Kozak, R. & Hagerman, S. Difficult climate-adaptive decisions in forests as complex social–ecological systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2108326119 (2022).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thom, D. et al. The impacts of climate change and disturbance on spatio-temporal trajectories of biodiversity in a temperate forest landscape. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 28–38 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Koelemeijer, I. A. et al. Interactive effects of drought and edge exposure on old-growth forest understory species. Landsc. Ecol. 37, 1839–1853 (2022).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qie, L. et al. Drought cuts back regeneration in logged tropical forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 045012 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Verheyen, K. et al. Combining biodiversity resurveys across regions to advance global change research. Bioscience 67, 73–83 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Bruelheide, H. et al. sPlot—a new tool for global vegetation analyses. J. Veg. Sci. 30, 161–186 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
Archaux, F. & Wolters, V. Impact of summer drought on forest biodiversity: what do we know? Ann. For. Sci. 63, 645–652 (2006).
Article Google Scholar
Hoover, D. L., Wilcox, K. R. & Young, K. E. Experimental droughts with rainout shelters: a methodological review. Ecosphere 9, e02088 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Bugmann, H. & Seidl, R. The evolution, complexity and diversity of models of long-term forest dynamics. J. Ecol. 110, 2288–2307 (2022).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rammer, W. & Seidl, R. A scalable model of vegetation transitions using deep neural networks. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 879–890 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanczuk, P. et al. Microclimate and forest density drive plant population dynamics under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 840–847 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
Calders, K. et al. Terrestrial laser scanning in forest ecology: expanding the horizon. Remote Sens. Environ. 251, 112102 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
Webster, C., Essery, R., Mazzotti, G. & Jones, T. Using just a canopy height model to obtain lidar-level accuracy in 3D forest canopy shortwave transmissivity estimates. Agric. For. Meteorol. 338, 109429 (2023).
Article Google Scholar
EU Forest Strategy to 2030, https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/forest-strategy_en (European Commission, accessed 9 June 2023).
Download references
I thank my colleagues at the Forest & Nature Lab and J. Lenoir, F. Zellweger, R. Seidl, T. Jucker, F. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Ø. Opedal, S. Caluwaerts, M. Baele, D. Miralles, K. Calders and H. Verbeeck for extensive discussions and comments on earlier versions of this idea and/or manuscript. I also thank K. De Pauw, C. Greiser, W. Maes, T. Nagel, F. Selvi, F. Rodríguez-Sánchez and P. Sanczuk for help with the figures. I received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (ERC Starting Grant FORMICA 757833).
Forest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Gontrode, Belgium
Pieter De Frenne
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Pieter De Frenne.
The author declares no competing interests.
Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Nidhi Vinod, Henry Adams and Marion Pfeifer for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
In this example, the high-light return interval (X-axis) and size of the area of high light (Y-axis) increase when entire regions are hit more frequently by summer droughts due to anthropogenic climate change leading to large-scale tree defoliation and mortality. The zone of novel light regimes is shaded in green. Similar examples can be made with other spatial and temporal characteristics of light distribution at forest floors not found previously.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and Permissions
De Frenne, P. Novel light regimes in European forests. Nat Ecol Evol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02242-2
Download citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02242-2
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Advertisement
© 2023 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.